Forum SIMSON JAWA ROMET (!!) Strona Główna
->
sprzedam
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
NIE
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
motorowery
----------------
Simson
Jawa
Romet Ogar
Romet Komar
problemy
----------------
problemy
sklepik
----------------
Kupię
sprzedam
zamienię
wasze
----------------
wasze motorowery
top lista
wasze motocykle
motocykle
----------------
motocykle
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
yxgaxjlywf
Wysłany: Sob 4:24, 26 Mar 2011
Temat postu: How
How
Everyone has their own set of value criteria. Everyone has the instinct to do moralist. The face of things substandard own values, to love find fault, or even BS-ing. I think this is not a tolerant attitude of the person.
tolerance must have principles. This principle is to The problem is when people are judged on what is Jiachou E is a problem, then, this principle is to actually lose their effectiveness.
a person has no right to choose? Answer is undoubtedly yes. A person's choice, they do not harm the interests of his choice should be affirmed. Of course, here to exclude But I do not say that the legal and moral, because it is a history of legal and ethical limits, are in a particular historical period in order to complete development of a specific historical mission, or conventional. I do not say to obey the law does not mean to violate the law, because for 99.9% of the law, you as long as the law, you will surely harm the interests of others. Well, there is 0.1% of the law, even if you are illegal, in fact, is not harmed the interests of others.
example, As early as 1957, Ma Yin-chu to propose to control the population perspective, and made a Of course, we can understand, because it was preparing to universal, in that era, the war is to fight human consumption. To the era of reform and opening up, the population problem have become increasingly prominent, so only to control the population, family planning. Basically, the reproductive rights are fundamental rights of citizens, students may not be born for babies, many students can, as long as their support it. However, there is no such constitutional provisions, the Constitution provides that This is according to our conditions correct choice. However, until a few years later, I believe the Constitution should be amended this one sooner or later. By that time, such as Yao Ming, who will be blessed. Therefore, in China, we have only incomplete reproductive rights. But if you are a tolerant people, you should not go to other people's fertility struggle. Students not only support, not to assume the responsibility of bringing up, it is still subject to moral condemnation.
the moral front, the recent relatively hot speculation is undoubtedly the If a person committed suicide or attempted suicide, we will sentence him to illegal? Of course not it. You will find this question ridiculous,
timberland shoes
, right? Similarly, the two couples behind closed doors, wife-swapping, as long as the four of them happy, what other people have the right to make irresponsible remarks? Not to mention the Therefore, Li Yinhe's views, I support. Browse the web of speech, I feel most users are not in favor of criminal involvement, at worst a moral issue. Also, I have reason to believe that with the progress of society, even the behavior of wife-swapping are not enough on moral issues. Morality has a distinct regional, national and times, different peoples in different times adhere to different moral. So, sometimes to pick up some narrow moral blame to others is not a tolerant or even accusing should behave.
example: Not long ago, some people accused Zuying go online sexy. In my opinion, such a person is not for Zuying speculation, it must be a tumor in his head.
ultimately sentence: a person freedom of choice, should also have respect for others choices magnanimous, as long as the person's choice does not cause substantial harm to others, we should all be
this point is actually a basic human rights.
So, standing on this point, I can understand some of the words Li Yinhe. She said: . She added: I agree.
some readers might see here, shouted abuse, and even greeting and my father and mother, then I say you are not a tolerant person. Tolerant towards dissidents who would rationally argue remarks, rebuttal, he can still insist on self, but also allow others to adhere to the self.
be honest, the fundamental problem is that our ideology inside, there are many things authoritarian, in this ideology in the talk about Everyone really wants to learn tolerance, to the whole society becomes rational and wise up, provided that: basic human rights are fully respected.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
xeon Template ©
Digital-Delusion
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Regulamin