SIMSON JAWA ROMET (!!) :: Przegląd tematu - Need to improve our standard of secondary language

xie2010397

Need to improve our standard of secondary language education
Ding Kai array
language proposition to take the exam for years, and scoring, to the Department of Chinese students to teach writing and literature appreciation courses, review their own language learning, writing and study the road ... ... sort of experience and reflection, that I have such a clear sense of: the standard of language education in secondary schools is low. Frankly, we train high school graduates, literary reading, understanding and skills are generally not ideal, the lack of depth of thoughts and feelings, language, pale and weak.
how to solve this problem? I guess, we may think of the following ways: increase the hours of school language courses, please well-known writer and reading materials prepared by the experts, language teachers for secondary schools to provide more opportunities of further studies, changes in college entrance examination methods, the reform policy of College Admissions, etc. and so on.
these methods, it will naturally have their own effect. However, I think they have a common drawbacks: nowhere near enough. Because they do not put effort in direct and hands-on training students to think independently (including research and writing) abilities.
So, how to train students in the language of independent thinking and hands-on capacity?
\understand that part of the national secondary school language teaching methods, I think, for our government education departments and reference for the experts. My two German students and a Spanish student told me: in their country, have such a high school language classes: certain well-known writer of topical studies. German secondary school study of the topic writer Goethe, Spanish writer is a secondary feature of Cervantes. Method in class about the two countries: the classroom, teachers lead students to read major works of the writer, or even to remember some important segments; outside the classroom, ask students to collect as much as possible of books and papers, trying to put forward their own views, written in papers to the teachers approval. This topic of course the famous writer, time is usually one semester a week for three hours. Lessons from their number and asked to see, of Chinese, we rarely have such a program, there must also elective, basic course is not the case.
piggyback say something, the German high school, not only Chinese lessons with Goethe thematic studies, foreign languages, there are well-known writer thematic studies,headphones, such as Shakespeare in English class Research - English proficiency students generally higher in Germany, perhaps with this.
reference to the practice of Germany and Spain, our high school language courses should be selected case studies where a writers? In my opinion, whether it is on the social impact, or the depth of thinking, artistic height, non-contemporary writers is none other than Lu Xun.
to Lu Xun, everyone will think of in recent years around the middle school language selection of his works into the fierce debate over the number of issues. Education management and publishing relevant government agencies so far as to students thinking of his works difficult to understand the reasons, the deletion of his works, and replaced by popular books like the martial arts of the fragments. This approach, even to win the approval of many people. Talking behind closed doors, this approach and ideas, it seems not unreasonable. But if we look at people in Germany, Spain, the practice is not difficult to find such a fact: they are high school students to university students in the direction of the train, we train the students to the primary direction. In other words, they are every day, every year we are down. One has been a profound impact on contemporary Chinese culture, the only international influence of the modern writers, the early years of language teaching in high school it is selected for more than a dozen of his essays, that the election was actually more, simply incredible . In my opinion, the current text of selected high school textbooks is highly undesirable practice of spreading black pepper, and three or four mediocre writers work flow, in addition to wasting valuable youth outside of school students, of no value.
taking into account the long history of our country and the characteristics of literary history - particularly the developed ancient body of poetry, I think our secondary language should also be set up a special study of ancient writers course. As for the candidates, I think that Du Fu is the most appropriate. There are two reasons: Du Fu's thought is positive, mainstream, Du Fu's art is rich, master of the.
was possible to Du Fu, Lu Xun's works hard to understand, not suitable for high school students to learn,dre headphones, and be against it. In this regard, I think I can answer: for the understanding of the great writers and their works do not have to pursue in one step, you can with age,monster beats, experience, school support the increase, Deep, better and better. Du Fu's poetry and prose of Lu Xun's novel, is worthy of our life-long reading of literature. Moreover, the emperor is said to have said so: \Secondary school students read popular literature, it is emulated in the next, there will be no income.
Some may also have to learn history and geography to high school students, science and foreign languages, not so much time in-depth study of works by authors as a reason for someone to be against it. In this regard, I think that might solve this: cut the current set of political and ideological education. This by no means do not speak of politics, ignore the ideological education. In fact, Du Fu, Lu Xun and his works in the body to a very rich and valuable hidden political and ideological content. At least, Du Fu, Lu Xun for the country, nation, people's feelings, are always worthy of our study. Practically speaking, some of our political and ideological education course, a little self-deception, the effect is not good.
; ; 2010-5-5