 Wysłany: Sob 23:04, 05 Mar 2011 Temat postu: 1000 points |
|
| 00
rounds of the game. If one of them succumbed to the temptation to defectit would very probably end up with fewer points than 600 because of retaliation by the other player (most of the submitted strategies had some kind of retaliatory behaviour built into them). We can use 600 as a kind of benchmark for a gameand express all Fairly good REWARD for mutual cooperation 3 points Very bad SUCKER'S PAYOFF 0 points Very good TEMPTATION to defect 5 points Fairly bad PUNISHMENT for mutual defection 1 point 210 Nice guys finish first scores as a percentage of this benchmark. On this scale it is theoretically possible to score up to 166 per cent (1000 points)but in practice no strategy's average score exceeded 600. Remember that the 'players' in the tournament were not humans but computer programspreprogrammed strategies. Their human authors played the same role as genes programming bodies (think of 4's computer chess and the Andromeda computer). You can think of the strategies as miniature 'proxies' for their authors. Indeedone author could have submitted more than one strategy (although it would have been cheating��and Axelrod would presum- ably not have allowed it��for an author to 'pack' the competition inexpensive christian louboutinsyilai: nike high heels http://www.khmerpyroo.com/forumming/index.php?topic=145402.msg368430#msg368430 |
|
