Autor Wiadomość
john2072
PostWysłany: Wto 7:47, 08 Mar 2011    Temat postu: usually 20percent

were too small to use them efficiently. There were not
enough tractors to satisfy the needs of the collective farms; and after the
slaughter of horses and oxen by the peasantsmechanical power was crucial
for the success of agriculture. Even if some larger collective farms could
have used tractors ef?cientlythey could not perform proper maintenance.
But even aside from the economic considerationsthe Soviet regime had
other reasons for concentrating machinery. The concentration of imple-
ments allowed centralization and control. The kolkhozes drew up contracts
with the MTSs according to which the kolkhoz handed over a percentage of
the produce (usually 20percent). By and large in collectives which were
served by MTSsthe peasants received even less compensation than in farms
without the bene?t of mechanization. From the point of view of the peas-
ants the MTS was just one more exploiter. Since the state managed the
MTSsit received two shares of the harvest: one as general procurement
which every collective had to payand another as payment for the labor
rendered.
The MTSs were fortresses of the city in the hostile countryside. It was
natural to make them supervisors of the political education system in the
villages. Each christian louboutin sneakersyilai:
nike high heels
louis vuitton outlet


http://www.khmerpyroo.com/forumming/index.php?topic=147865.msg376083#msg376083

Powered by phpBB © 2001,2002 phpBB Group