john2072
czołg
Dołączył: 26 Sty 2011
Posty: 1715
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/10
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Pon 5:06, 25 Kwi 2011 Temat postu: hrthaaeieb |
|
|
yixian:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
) I will revert to this question
presentlyfor I wish now to discuss Alpakhar's rule.
(26) He requiresas we have statedthat we should accept as trueor
reject as falseeverything asserted or denied by Scriptureand he further
states that Scripture never expressly asserts or denies anything which
contradicts its assertions or negations elsewhere. (27) The rashness of such
a requirement and statement can escape no one. (2 For (passing over the
fact that he does not notice that Scripture consists of different books
written at different timesfor different peopleby different authors: and
also that his requirement is made on his own authority without any
corroboration from reason or Scripture) he would be bound to show that
all passages which are indirectly contradictory of the restcan be
satisfactorily explained metaphorically through the nature of the language
and the context: furtherthat Scripture has come down to us untampered
with. (29) Howeverwe will go into the matter at length.
(30) FirstlyI ask what shall we do if reason prove recalcitrant? (31)
Shall we still be bound to affirm whatever Scripture affirmsand to deny
whatever Scripture denies? (32) Perhaps it will be answered that Scripture
A Theol [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
