john2072
czołg
Dołączył: 26 Sty 2011
Posty: 1715
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/10
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Sob 23:04, 05 Mar 2011 Temat postu: 1000 points |
|
|
00
rounds of the game. If one of them succumbed to the temptation to
defectit would very probably end up with fewer points than 600
because of retaliation by the other player (most of the submitted
strategies had some kind of retaliatory behaviour built into them).
We can use 600 as a kind of benchmark for a gameand express all
Fairly good
REWARD
for mutual cooperation
3 points
Very bad
SUCKER'S PAYOFF
0 points
Very good
TEMPTATION
to defect
5 points
Fairly bad
PUNISHMENT
for mutual defection
1 point
210 Nice guys finish first
scores as a percentage of this benchmark. On this scale it is
theoretically possible to score up to 166 per cent (1000 points)but
in practice no strategy's average score exceeded 600.
Remember that the 'players' in the tournament were not humans
but computer programspreprogrammed strategies. Their human
authors played the same role as genes programming bodies (think of
4's computer chess and the Andromeda computer). You
can think of the strategies as miniature 'proxies' for their authors.
Indeedone author could have submitted more than one strategy
(although it would have been cheating��and Axelrod would presum-
ably not have allowed it��for an author to 'pack' the competition [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]yilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
