maxshoe138
hulajnoga
Dołączył: 27 Paź 2010
Posty: 48
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/10
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Czw 5:21, 25 Lis 2010 Temat postu: one mistake |
|
|
. Founded in 2006, this emerging fund management company's first products were issued - China Post Core Selection Fund investment returns for 2007 all funds in the country ranked second. However,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in 2008, passed their prime in the Post Office,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which suffered heavy losses under the two funds, suffered heavy losses. This once again shows that asset management is a stand out in the process of long-distance running, and any similarity with the background of the industry, the fund industry do not believe that \br> in the Post Office staged a \Army - China Post's first venture fund management companies only products - China Post Core Selection Fund. The former to 226.09% of the net growth rate of the column partial shares the Fund's annual champion, 191.47% of the latter only with the subsequent results. For a time, the Post Fund is called a dark horse in the fund industry. However, when the light into 2008, but the fate of the two funds had different changes.
As of April 14, 2008 close, the Chinese market this year, the Fund's net growth rate of -16.02%, still in partial relatively defensive stock funds, the core of preferred funds are calculated in the Post -32.96% of net growth in actively managed open-end funds ranked in the bottom third. The China Post venture fund management company's partial shares of another open-ended fund in the growth performance of the core is more Post less, the net growth of only -33.05%. If the fund management company as a whole as the evaluation criteria, venture fund management companies in the Post this year is undoubtedly the worst performing investment management fund management company. Once again, history shows that,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in any industry, \Tests have not experienced for a long time do not have the most brilliant achievements sustainable. In 2007, the operating strategy to take too radical and boarded the gorgeous center of the stage, the postal system in 2008 is bound to be bitter. This horse fund industry's \
Although we do not want to use the relatively short-term performance of the investment fund management companies considering capacity, but there are indications that the defeat of the postal system is not accidental,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], has a more deep-seated underlying causes. From the fund asset allocation and portfolio management point of view, the Post Office in its fund portfolio a high degree of overlap, take over the operation of radical strategy, excessive reliance on star fund manager's approach is the most important of the three major mistakes.
one mistake: the same back into the same,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Awkwardness enlarge the risk
highly overlap in the first Post Office in Post only products Optimum Fund was established in the core of October 2006, the second product China Post Core Growth Fund was established in August 2007. From the prospectus of view, two investment philosophy and performance of the Fund's benchmark is not the same.
the Post Fund's core investment philosophy is preferred to adhere to and deepen the value of the investment philosophy, based on research and analysis through professional, actively explore a core competitive advantage, stable growth prospects and the intrinsic value of the industries and companies. China Post Core Growth Fund is considered to have continued growth in capacity of high-growth companies can bring a premium, and thus bring long-term capital appreciation; only focus on business growth in the quality and comprehensive management capabilities to accurately identify the company's core values, reduce investment risks, supplemented by good risk control,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and effectively protect the stability of the Fund's assets value.
visible, with the preferred core funds Postal compared to China Post Core Growth Fund, a greater emphasis on growth. However,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in the actual asset allocation in the common position of the features of the two funds is obvious. The end of the fourth quarter of 2007, two funds have nine top ten Awkwardness coincidence, but a slightly different proportion of ownership (Table 1, Table 2). China Post Core Growth is not so much a new product,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it is more preferred in the core-mail a copy of the Fund.
相关的主题文章：
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
many ways
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
