dobso728rf
hulajnoga
Dołączył: 30 Mar 2011
Posty: 43
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/10 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Śro 10:33, 13 Kwi 2011 Temat postu: nike jordan 13 Doomsday's Doomed Concept Does Homa |
|
|
Doomsday has not only acknowledged this, unfortunately, but emphasized another problem that has been noteworthy in the movie industry both in the category of making movies based on multiple blockbusters and movies based on novels: in the process of its many references, Doomsday tries to combine too many subjects at once, often making the movie too heavy to follow its storyline seamlessly.
But it is not unjustified when one considers Marshall’s homage to movies that die-hard movie lovers will recognize in style and placement. Marshall may have wanted this movie to be like those old pulp films that he grew up watching, ranging from the Road Warrior, to Snake Plisken's "Escape" series, 28 Days Later, and several other films belonging to the b-movie realm. These movies have been known to offer entertainment for the sacrifice of strong plots, logical explanations [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and often are made with low budgets that often could not afford higher quality special effects to cover these issues up.
Stating this is no minor feat for many. On IMDB, it is notoriously considered one of the worst movies made for its time. Movie lampooners have used this film as a form of mockery of sorts, and the humor company Rifftrax has a playlist of mockeries that lampoon the film's scale of unintentional silliness. The Golden Raspberry Award Foundation (think of it as an antithesis to the Oscars), remarked that it was the worst movie ever made in 25 years since their inception. Its main pastime has been used as a mark of fun mockery by movie fans who use it to laugh at and invent jokes based on its poorly-structured design. Acknowledging that, making such a comparison can breed a sort of anger and contempt from fans of Doomsday to pair these movies together.
Neil Marshall’s latest movie Doomsday continues to exhibit thrill from faithful fans and moviegoers alike. The movie—centered around Caryn Peterson as a special agent (think of her the same way you would an action movie with Charlise Theron) who must infiltrate a walled-in society of miscreants broken off from an outside world searching for a cure to an epidemic—is shot with well-budgeted shots [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], plenty of action and gruesome bits in-between. The plot [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], however, is very scattered and, despite how glorious the cinematography is, it has left some thinking back to a poorly-edited movie inspired by L. Ron Hubbard that was made years ago called Battlefield Earth.
Battlefield Earth?!
Justified Praise/Unjustified Criticism?
Read on
Up Best Reviewed Film of 2009
The Animated History of Lois Lane
A look at Underworld 3 with Rhona Mitra
A fight scene of hundreds of stealthy frenzied cannibals that rather would rush the hero rather than maintain their stealth as a reflection of how inferiorly trained they are.A gasoline can full of
Why should Doomsday be praised if there is already so much going against it from a conventional standpoint? This seems to be the most difficult concept to accept. Should a movie be considered great for being cheesy and silly simply because the director wanted it to be this way? Is there really such an off-center decision behind what makes a movie good and bad? Moreso, does this mean that we should love the movies that we came to hate for their corniness to the point of mocking them? While the concept is conceivable, it is, at the same time, difficult to see the approval that the fans have.
Perhaps the one thing that makes it the most difficult to agree with them is the fact that these same fans not only approve of the homage to the films of Marshall's past, but also claim to validate Doomsday's merit by defending the film with scenes that patched bits of the coarse plot. These points have included:
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|