Tods boots Ram Sethu- Proof of Great Science of An

useming43

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Why didnt he tell the world that it was Lord Rama who builds it and give the honor to somebody another of this excellent happening? After all, Lord Rama was the hero of his imagination.
How many such Chain of Shoals bridging two nations is known to Dr. Ramanujam? Is there any other Geographical construct anywhere in the world deposits of shoals onward the coast doesnt say that it bridges two land pieces?
The first object to consider is that under the current scientific evaluation, the bridge is proved to have a necklace of shoals is 30 to 35 km long in Palk Street, and its solitary curvature confirms that it is man made, and is not a Geographical Construct at all.
Archeological findings have proven thahead of signs of human citizens in Sri Lanka date behind to primitive age of about 1,750,000 years of the same era as Ramayan (Treta Yug, which lies accurate mid direction to upon digit).
Sri Lankan Government has done Archeological Survey and found some very amusing data:
A mountain covered entirely with herbal factories of same type that is found in Himalayas. There is no other mountain in whole Sri Lanka of that kind. This stands as an evidence that the mountain was brought by Lord Hanuman to Sri Lanka How was this done is subject to study? To my knowledge, Sri Yantra of Hindu myth (or may be similar constructs) is actually a anti-gravitation theory which was know to our Rishis in those days and these things were likely only by such method. Someday, science will surely understand this.
Ashok Vatika is traced with complete Greenery and meantime soil. With a gap of hardly 10-20 meters, soil suddenly turns to be dark and burnt and it stretches to miles. This highly unnatural and it stands to prove that Lord Hanuman had burnt Lanka.

What was the need to mention that certain Machineries were used for constructing the bridge? How did an ancient man assume of machineries?
Historian B.D. Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru University says the archaeological record says nought of the sort. There is no evidence of a human presence in the subcontinent, he says, before roughly 250,000 to 300,000 years ago. It is generally trusted man's hominid ancestors did not leave their African family until about two million years ago.
I do not understand, if such an prodigious fabricate is not among the approach of modern science, why cant this bridge be put as an of the Wonders? Why cant it be listed under World Heritages (yet nourish it as Hindu divine location)? Instead, the anti-Hindu pushes are motivating Congress to destroy the bridge.
Now, let us go into the Valmiki Ramayan and dig out more history out of it. Let us be sure that if we want to excavate history, we have to touch Valmiki Ramayan lonely and not any other Ramayan,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], because always other Ramayan are written with intention of promoting Ramayan and recording the event.
2. Ramayan says that it was build under the supervision of an Architect Nala son of the greatest Architect of all times Vishwakarma (Note: Vishwakarma is a designation given to the greatest archeologist and founder of the era in ancient Hindu society, a similar train as we have in modern world of Nobel Prize). Thus, the book makes sure that such a bridge can be constructed by only architect of highest skill.
Let us have a background of what politicians and historians (British written history literates) say about Ram Sethu.
The long coast currents aboard the southern side of isle created a discontinuous shoreline eastward from Dhanuskodi to Talaimannar, which's the Adam's Bridge.
He said that Adam's Bridge is only a chain of shoals between the Palk Strait and the Gulf of Mannar, created by sedimentation unpaid to long shore currents.
6. The breadth vs. length percentage also looks scientific and supportive to help carry such a huge mass across the bridge. The bridge is wide enough so as to resist the weight of crores of Vanaras and allow passage to all of them.
13. The width of the bridge matches to what is mentioned in Ramayan.
Let us penetrate what Mr. Ramanujam has said:
Why do the politicians mislead the nation by saying that Lord Rama was a Superman who build the bridge, when Ramayan apparently says that it is not Lord Rama but the Architect Nala and Neela who build the bridge?
2. Analysis of Valmiki Ramayan over RAM SETHU
Professor Dupey says that as per Archeological survey, remains from Ayodhya controversial site has found temple remains whose age do not go further 600 B.C.
Do our Historians want to mention that if Pushpak Viman existed then Valmiki would have mentioned how it was built? How many history book of today contains the technological theory of erection machinery why dont our historians first do this?
So, looking at Ramayan alone one can conclude that the Bridge is not a normal construct. Having proven on the point of Bridge alone that Ramayan is not a book of myth, merely a book of History, it straight away brings the truth that Maharishi Valmiki was the first Historian known to male variety
Ramayan mentions namely the bridge was built over the sea water, with support of Sea this implies namely there was not supporting archaeology contained in constructing the bridge this namely easily supported at the failure of Archeology ground to trace such constructs below ground. Yet the presence of shoals beneath the bridge and their type indicate that they cannot be base in sea in the form it exists by Ram Sethu.
10. Ramayan also depicts the materials used in making the bridge clarifying that it was a possibility, but not under imagination of human capacity under technology support of today.
Temples are build and reproduce and their age can only say about the age of the temple and the age of the personality whose worship is done in the temple.
Very important Ramanujam is incapable to change the names of two places as Dhanuskodi and Talaimannar which are not English names as they already exist, and hence successfully accepts a controversial English name of Adams Bridge instead of Ram Setu. Mr. Ramanujam could very easily put his theory with the name of the Bridge still as Ram Setu. But he ends up in saying that is Adams Bridge WHY?
Parvatanshch Samutpatya Yantraiyah Parivahanti Cha’
3. Current Findings on RAM SETHU and their analysis
However, we need to beyond examine present discoveries for well.
Another important fictitious topic of Ramayan is Pushpak Viman a vehicle that could take supernal route to travel. No doubt the Pusphak Viman no more exists, but it cannot be fantasy as we have similar climate planes telling about it. What challenges the notion of Viman is the understanding that technology has developed in current era and people were devoid of such high-tech products in ancient India. But then Ramayan gives a backdrop of Pushpak Viman in terms of how it was earned, thereby making one consider that it was not a mere fantasy. It should not be expected from the book Ramayan to describe the details of Pushpak Viman creation. The question that should be queried is where the actual scientific data of Hindu researches about building the Pushpak Viman got lost and true history of India and world ambition evolve.

Why Mr. Chattopadhyay wants to defy a true instance with a artificial belief? Does Mr. Chattopadhyay want to say that Lord Rama is deep in the heart of billions of Indians to this date without any truth? Can disloyal beliefs find so deep root in society and fknow next to nothing of long time?
If the erasure of a 500 year old Babri Masjid is not permissible and it created mayhem in the earth, why is million year old constructs not protected? Thousands of Hindu temples have been destroyed and are creature destroyed as yet in Kashmir,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and so numerous additional countries. Neither media nor politics talks almost it. Why shouldnt Hindus stand now to defend Ram Sethu,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which is a direct proof of One million old history of India?
Very important point here is that Mr. Chattopadhyay has forgot to note that what is said of hominid progenitors is likewise a faith a belief generated by Western people and followed by Mr. Chattopadhyay not Truth, not Science. Surely Ramayan, if a belief is a belief of eastern people Indian People. Mr. Chattopadhyay is trying to introduce a belief impact.
Why did Valmiki thrust his imagination to get the bridge completed only in 5 days? He could have well additional the number of days to aid people of today understand it more logically. Or he could have even depressed the number of days to highlight the power of Lord Rama.
Does Mr. Ramanujam want to say that if Adam built it, it is history, but if Lord Rama built it it is a Myth and a natural construct?
Again Mr. Ramanujam is taking support of dissimilar belief to buffet the truth. He is talking of Gondwana theory, a theory that has no cement proof an fantastic thesis with some scientific logic backward it. Hundreds of such theory can be generated based on Geographical principles, but that do not defy a concrete cause of existence.
If yes, then Adam and Eve existed in India alone as the bridge is in India Again controversy as Manu Shatrupa would be more known names in this region and likeness to Adam and Eve. Moreover, approval of Adams Bridge is approval that it was build by Adam. Actually, the logic fits inverse to them how can the first man on earth build a bridge of that volume? He would be immature at first place, he is alone at second place and why will he ever endeavor to bridge the sea? Though the only evidence is with India, no logic fits to the name as Adams Bridge. This clearly reflects the Christian mentality trying to impose and kill Hindu greatness. And needy Historians of India, brought up in the schooling system of English,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], unable to destroy the boundary of false arrogance of being high literary, seems to be helplessly saying that Ram Setu Bandh is not historical. They cannot even hold a petty vision that humans have build wall of length of Great wall of China that is apparent from even Satellite; what would stop humans to build Ram Setu Bandh and what is surprising or opposing to the fact that it was built as a part of Ramayan as a history.
Now, Mr. Dubey accepts that the age of Shoals found at Ram Sethu goes around 1 million years. He misguides human, as he is a literate of History written by British, that Ramayan was premier written around 10000 years ago and not 1 million years antecedent. Mr. Dubey, here is a uncomplicated measurement for you to further investigate:
Assume that Puri temple would have been razed some 10000 years ago, what technology or archeological proofs would be derived to conclude that the temple was 200 ft tall?
Why dont these politicians and historians say how are these mentioned in Ramayan? Did these places pre-existed and Valmiki traveled a lot to create this anecdote? Or these places were labeled behind people read Valmiki Ramayan?
Ram Sethu: Proof of Great Science of Ancient Past
1. Indian Historians: Notorious or Ignorant
The more logical response is, these places pre-existed and the event took place which Valimiki wrote as poetic history.
They were combined till a ridge was formed in the region owing to thinning of earth's crust. The development of this ridge augmented the coral growth in the region.
We need to know definite points here, modern Archeology and Science is distant alter than what secondhand to exist in archaic India. For example, age temples of India, additionally existing, were built on a another technology than what we detect in modern civil engineering. This doesnt average that ancient archeology was not having mathematics maturity in truth, if we see at Temples of India, Jagannath Puri temple for example, we do not detect any iron alternatively pillars accustom to build the temple yet it stands from hundreds of years to a elevation of nigh 200 ft.
Why did Mr. Ramanujam accept Adam’s theory to be correct? Does Mr. Ramanujam want to support that Adam and Eve existed and Lord Rama didn’t exist?
1. There is no other book than Ramayan that has put into scriptures describing such geographical constructs.
Science is now saying that the age of globe is around 4 billion years can science produce a history of 4 billion years with concrete proof no one asks this question and believes science. No one knows how many generation of humanity evolved and got destroyed since the earth was formed. No one knows when the earth was exactly formed. Actual fictions and stories lie on this side as well but our darling Historians do not have the bravery to flatter about it.
11. Seeing the time limitation, it looks logical to have Vanars who are brisk in their manoeuvre collecting materials and fitting it in place as directed.
Explaining the bridge's geological history, he said both the Palk Strait and the GoM were once chapter of the Cauvery basin, which was formed during the disjunction of India and Antarctica about 70 million years ago during the `Gondwana period.'
More than a hundred years ago, when History of India was written under British influence, there was no apartment for Ramayan and Mahabharat as historical memorabilia. They were epics and of no importance for students. It is surprising that India is one nation whose history has been written by its enemies and the entire nation yet follows it. No doubt the history was a strategic attack on Indian civilization and culture that paved way for western mores into the nation. With time, truth is evolving back. Science of India that was denied is now preferred through western inspire. The myths are suddenly emerging to be history. And one such history is Ram Sethu. Since, it is a history of Hindus, politics and literates are not prepared to accept it as truth.
Here are certain points from Valmiki Ramayan to be considered:
5. The file that more than a crore (10 million) Vanaras were involved in building it, seems to be logical to eligible to support the volume of the bridge constructed. Now, the calculate may not be exact, but naturally Valmiki wants to say that there was a huge task coerce going for the bridge.
8. The bridge is said to be constructed by around a crore Vanaras, the count fits the likelihood of obtaining the bridge constructed in such a small period a huge task force doing it. Though, the methodology of construction is not elaborated and shrank by mentioning that manifold Yantras or Machinery were used to build the bridge, but it gives an indication that machinery were applied to do the task. It should be a subject to learn about our elapse. Valmiki Ramayan: Yuddha Kanda, 22.60:
There are many other proofs that have come up, but I consider these 2 points as muscular as the Bridge itself.
9. Very interestingly, Rama is not said to have built the bridge and the point clarifies that building it was the skill of an architect Nala and not Rama or Hanuman, the hero of the book. Had Ramayan been a fantasy of Maharishi Valmiki, he would easily fantasized and written something like Rama built a bridge of Arrows as Rama was the hero in fantasy. But it is not so, making one think that it is not fantasy writing.
Can our Historians consult the British again and create more theory around these evidences, so that they can be included in History books against Ramayan?
Valmiki could have easily shown Lord Rama winning the war with few hundred Vanars as his soldiers why 10 million?
How is that scientific age of the shoals and the Hindu almanac age of Lord Rama matches exactly? Will Mr. Dubey and other historians defiance to come out of the falsehood of our enemy educations and try to explore some mathematics of Hindus before they say make such silly comparison of scientific ages?
Mr. Dubey: Do you want to say that if I build a temple today, you will conclude that Lord Rama existed since today and not ahead?
3. The bridge was (Ramayan mentions the bridge constructed in 5 days: 14 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 = 100 yojans) 100 Yojans long and 10 Yojans wide. Data to be considered here:
I read a similar comment from N Ramanujam. Head, Post Graduate Department of Geology and Research Centre, V.O. Chidambaram College, Tuticorin.
7. The bridge is said to be built in 5 days, giving an fancy that bridge had to be built in a quite short phase of time, shortcoming which the Opponent King Ravana would have come to know about it and would have attacked never granting the bridge to be constructed. Thus, the duration fits the war logic.
‘Hastimatran Mahakayah Pashananshch Mahabalah
12. The places mentioned in Ramayan exactly matches to the current place of the bridge, accordingly confirming that the book is not a story.
The age of the bridge as per scientific dating comes to around 1 million years. As per Hindu scriptures, Ramayan took place in Treta Yug. Calculating by Hindu scriptures (Treta Yug with a tenure of 12,96,000 years, Dwapar Yug with a tenure of 8, 64,000 years, Kali Yug has equitable seen 5,000 years): We know thatTreta Yug was before Dwapar Yug. So, one thing is quite evident. The Bridge was constructed at least 8,64,000 years ago, i.e., 0.86 million years ago, which is beautiful close to 1 million years. Treta Yuga itself is 1.3 million years of age.
"The coral cover performed as a `sand trapper' leading to the formation of Rameswaram Island," Dr. Ramanujam said.
If they are so smart, let them bring an end to ... this treatise. I dare them via few answers mentioned in fearless in this story.
Similarly, the Ram Setu bandh has seen ages, and that also not on land, but in sea a turbulent sea. The important of the mass is already cleaned off a question to be mused is that what remains is just a trace of the actual bridge not the whole bridge as it was.
Why did Gondwana methodology leave a trace of only One Bridge on the Globe?
4. The data starts from 14 yojans as first daytime, which is fewer than other days data, confirming a logic thfirst and foremost daytime as a starting had taken time to gear up all Vanars. Second day it took momentum and rest of the days the distance of the bridge constructed is found to be nearly same. A logical conclusion of this sort is made only when the event have occurred in reality.
From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, maximum of the places still prop the names as it was around a million years ago. Even the devastating Muslim invasion could not eliminate the names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, Rameswaram, Lanka all the names are as mentioned in the book. Rameswaram is the place where Lord Rama worshipped Lord Shiva and created the idol Shiv Lingam, exist as yet as a place of adore. Ramayan talks about Mahendragiri Mountain as the highest point and best point to see along the sea. Geographically,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it is proven that Mahendragiri is the maximum mountain in that zone and gives a visibility of around 60 km scope.

What seems to be mythical to the Historians and Science is the concept of Monkey building the Bridge. But they forget to distend the vision on this,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], purely because of their prejudiced outlook to vanquishing Hindu belief. We all know now thatthere are many species that do not exist now and the largest known to human is Dinosaur. Why cant different specie exist around 1 million years ago with the capability of human comprehension and monkey like physical structure someone that was called as Vanars in those days? Science do not forget to mention that man evolved out of monkeys but defeats Hindus to consider that Vanars were the in among form of the evolution the evidence present in those days. But no view would think this, simply because then the religion of truce would win then. Yet, there is no doubt that evolution theory is repeatedly a controversial theory existing and taught to people, without any scientific certify around it.
No historian can veto the fact that there is a coincidence and only one coincidence between a reality and its incidence in a book called Ramayan. Instead, of now having set a direction to find out how such thing took place, these catholic fanatics are simply application all forces and theories to falsify a fact.

	Forum SIMSON JAWA ROMET (!!) Strona Główna -> wasze motorowery	Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1